Blog Post #2: Topic and Sources
Choice Paralysis in Action
Topic Discussion:
Alas, we're in week 4 of the semester, and I'm still refining my topic. The good (and bad) news is that I have so many research interests! I've been digging through databases for the past week and skimming lots of articles, but keeping in mind that we're writing literature reviews before we write our proposals, I'm trying to stick to something that already has a developed body of research that I could synthesize and build onto.
Since I'd like to create lesson plans for some sort of composition course, whether that be English 1010, English 2010, or a new Prof/Tech course, I looked into a number of sources regarding technical writing pedagogy. This bled into a few different possible research questions, all of which I've narrowed down to the themes of usability, accessibility, and universal design in the writing classroom.
Possible research questions (I did admittedly get some help from Chat GPT for these):
- What role do student perceptions and feedback play in shaping the design and accessibility of college classrooms, and how can their input be effectively integrated into the decision-making process?
- How can universal design principles be effectively implemented to create a more inclusive and accessible learning environment in college classrooms?
- What are the key usability challenges faced by students with disabilities in college classrooms, and how can these challenges be addressed through technology and design?
- How does the adoption of universal design principles in college classrooms impact the academic performance and overall experience of students with disabilities compared to traditional classroom settings?
Tentative Sources:
Dalton, E. M., Lyner-Cleophas, M., Ferguson, B. T., & McKenzie, J. (2019). Inclusion, universal design and universal design for learning in higher education: South Africa and the United States. African Journal of Disability, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.519
Shaw, R. A. (2011). Employing universal design for instruction. New Directions for Student Services, 134, 21–33.
Michael, M. G., & Trezek, B. J. (2006). Universal design and multiple literacies: Creating access and ownership for students with disabilities. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_4
Finn, D. (2022). Online learning and universal design: Practical applications for reaching adult learners. COABE Journal: The Resource for Adult Education, 11(1), 101–109.
Rao, K., Edelen-Smith, P., & Wailehua, C.-U. (2015). Universal design for online courses: applying principles to pedagogy. Open Learning, 30(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2014.991300
Williams, J., Rice, R., Lauren, B., Morrison, S., Van Winkle, K., & Elliott, T. (2013). Problem-based universal design for learning in technical communication and rhetoric instruction. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 247–261.
Laflen, A. (2023). Exploring how response technologies shape instructor feedback: A comparison of canvas Speedgrader, google docs, and Turnitin Grademark. Computers and Composition, 68, 102777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102777
Chen, J., Hughes, S., & Ranade, N. (2023). Reimagining student-centered learning: Accessible and inclusive syllabus design during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers and Composition, 67, 102751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102751
Stillman-Webb, N., Hilliard, L., Stewart, M. K., & Cunningham, J. M. (2023). Facilitating student discourse: Online and hybrid writing students’ perceptions of teaching presence. Computers and Composition, 67, 102761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2023.102761
Chong, F. (2016). The pedagogy of usability: An analysis of technical communication textbooks, anthologies, and course syllabi and descriptions. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2016.1113073
Schneider, S. (2005). Usable pedagogies: Usability, rhetoric, and sociocultural pedagogy in the technical writing classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(4), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1404_4
Sonka, K., McArdle, C., & Potts, L. (2021). Finding a teaching a11y: Designing an accessibility-centered pedagogy. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2021.3091190
Still, B., & Koerber, A. (2010). Listening to students: A usability evaluation of instructor commentary. Journal of Business & Technical Communication, 24(2), 206–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651909353304
Those sources look fantastic, Emily! You've found a lot of great research directly related to usability in the classroom. I like that as an avenue for exploring education and technical communication principles. I should pay more attention to it in my own materials. I have some practices I use, but it's always good to find more information for being a better teacher!
ReplyDeleteI think I have a fairly balanced list of sources in terms of different journals and databases. Computers and Composition in particular has some great, relevant sources. That said, they're all journal articles, so I may look into more books and dissertations to get a more rounded pool of research. Topic wise, they're all fairly tied to pedagogy with subtopics in usability, student feedback, universal design, rhetoric, and digital composition. There's of course some overlap, but I think grouping them would ultimately be helpful for my future literature review.
ReplyDelete